Visual Criterion
What Photography Tutorials Rarely Teach
Visual criterion is not something we learn easily.
For years, photography has been taught as a giant cookbook disguised as technical education. Put the light here. Use this lens. Shoot at f/2.8. Turn the face forty-five degrees. Separate the subject from the background. Enable this, disable that.
The silent promise always seems to be the same: follow these steps, and you will eventually arrive at the correct result.
And to be fair, recipes work. Of course, they do. If they didn’t, workshops would disappear, tutorials would vanish, and half of YouTube would collapse under the weight of cinematic-photo-in-five-minutes thumbnails featuring shocked faces and titles written entirely in capital letters.
The problem is that anyone who has spent enough time in a kitchen already knows an uncomfortable truth: two people can use the same ingredients and still cook completely different things.
The Recipe Nobody Wrote Down
Most families know this mystery by heart.
Grandma left the recipe behind. Two cups of flour, one spoon of this, a pinch of that, fifteen minutes in the oven. Everyone follows the instructions with near religious devotion. And eventually, someone says the inevitable sentence:
“It’s good… but it doesn’t taste the same.”
Nobody explains it properly. The explanation always drifts into strange territory. It was her hands. The way she stirred. Her timing. The fact that she somehow knew when to turn off the stove without checking the clock. Maybe she tasted the sauce first. Maybe there was some invisible ingredient nobody ever wrote down.
Seasoning.
Photography feels exactly the same way.
Two photographers can stand in the same place using the same camera, the same lens, the same light, photographing the same person. They can literally stand shoulder to shoulder and still create entirely different images. Not small differences. Completely different photographs.
Not because one photographer discovered a secret setting buried deep inside a camera menu designed by mysterious Japanese engineers.
The difference lives somewhere much harder to explain: the visual criterion.
What Nobody Stops to Teach
The problem is that the visual criterion is rarely taught.
We learn exposure, composition, shutter speed, aperture, lenses, rules, and settings. We learn tools. But very few people stop to explain how someone actually learns to see.
Because seeing is not simply opening your eyes.
Seeing is choosing.
Choosing what stays and what disappears. What deserves to remain inside the frame and what can quietly leave. What deserves patience and what deserves to be ignored. What is worth waiting for and what was never going to happen regardless of how long you stood there.
Something strange happened to me after years of making photographs. I stopped consciously calculating many of the things I once analyzed obsessively. I no longer think through every tiny detail before pressing the shutter. Sometimes I simply feel that the image is not ready yet.
So I move two steps forward. Step back one. Wait for a cloud. Wait for a glance. Wait for the wind. Wait for somebody to lower a hand at exactly the right moment. Wait for chaos to do something unexpected.
Because chaos always does.
That probably explains the plaque sitting on my desk that reads: Chaos Coordinator.
After enough years with a camera, you realize you are not always searching for an image. Sometimes you are waiting for permission. Permission from light. From timing. From the particular chaos that turns an ordinary scene into something worth keeping.
Photography often feels like a three-ring circus where everything appears random and completely out of control. And yet someone moved the lights, chose the location, watched the trapeze artist carefully, and somehow knew the exact moment to press the button. Not because they calculated it. Because they recognized it.
That recognition is visual criterion.
From Instructions to Intuition
Eventually these decisions stop feeling like instructions and become something else entirely.
They become intuition. Something like driving after many years behind the wheel, or preparing a barbecue without checking the clock every three minutes. You stop following steps and start reading signals. You stop asking what the rules say and start trusting what your eye already knows.
And eventually you understand something that once sounded completely absurd: recipes matter, of course they matter, but nobody remembers the recipe.
People remember the seasoning.
The Uncomfortable Role of Failure
There is something else tutorials almost never mention. Something that probably has more to do with developing visual criterion than any camera setting ever will.
Making mistakes.
Modern culture has developed a strange obsession with getting everything right on the first attempt. We want the perfect photograph, the perfect idea, the perfect sentence, and the perfect decision, preferably without suffering the deeply uncomfortable experience of failing in front of other human beings.
Bad news: life never received that memo.
Most of what we know was learned while improvising. Nobody was born knowing how to drive, how to love, how to raise children, how to cook, or how to understand why a photograph that looked incredible inside our heads somehow ended up looking like evidence from a police report taken at three in the morning.
I have repeated a line for years, usually as a joke:
“I never make mistakes. Well… I made one once. When I thought I was wrong.”
More or less a joke.
But humor has a dangerous habit. Sometimes it arrives disguised and quietly delivers uncomfortable truths on its way out. Because people who never make mistakes often belong to a very specific category: people who never actually do anything.
Developing your own eye, your own voice, your own visual criterion demands exactly the opposite. You have to try. Fail. Move the camera. Step back. Repeat. Insist. Accept that some photographs, some ideas, and some decisions simply will not become what you imagined, and that this is not failure. It is how the eye learns to see.
Grandma’s recipe probably did not appear perfect on day one either. There were experiments. Accidents. Smoke. And probably at least one soup somebody politely pretended to enjoy.
What Cooks Slowly
Technique can be learned in a workshop, a course, a tutorial, or an afternoon watching YouTube with enough patience and coffee.
Visual criterion is different.
It does not arrive on schedule. It does not respond to shortcuts. It cannot be downloaded, preset, or purchased alongside a new camera body.
It cooks slowly.
And it tastes considerably better with seasoning.
Photography doesn’t end when the shutter closes. Continue the conversation in The Journal.
If you read Spanish, you’ll find more of these ideas at Háblame de Fotos.
Jorge Javier Peña is a fine art and boudoir photographer based in Jacksonville, Florida. He is the founder of Ingravity Art, where he explores portraiture, identity, and the human presence in front of the camera.
Leave a Reply